Submissions
Are you a teacher, childcare provider, parent or policy maker who wants to submit innovative ideas for consideration and further exploration? Review the three pathways below to submit your idea.
Research Based Submissions
Demonstrates strong evidence to support the current need observed. Provides clear connections to existing literature while describing what the proposal will add to the body of research in this field. Describes the intended benefit to the target population achieved through the research. Describes who stakeholders are and how they are involved in the research design throughout the following processes: development, implementation, data collection, evaluation, etc. Demonstrates why the research is valuable and worth sharing with others.
Well Supported by Research
Demonstrates some evidence to support current need observed although biases or confounding factors may be present. Provides general connections to existing literature. Describes potential benefits to the target population achieved through the research. Identifies some of the stakeholders and their relative involvement in the research design for the following processes: development, implementation, data collection, evaluation, etc. Demonstrates the process to identify and assess any unexpected or unintentional results. Includes description of how the proposal adds to the body of research in the field.
Promising Research
Describes any existing theories, research, models, etc. that were loosely used to support the current need observed. Little connection is provided to existing literature as well as how the proposal adds to the body of research in the field. Benefits to the targeted population are not fully explored. Few stakeholders are identified and their involvement in the research design is obscured. More information may be needed for the following processes for the research design: development, implementation, data collection, evaluation, etc. Describes a process for identifying lessons learned.
Additional Research Needed
Practice Based Submissions
​Describes any existing theories, research, standards/guidelines, models, programs etc. that were used to inform the development of the practice. Describes an evaluation plan appropriate for scope of practice. Including but not limited to: participant selection process, relevant measures, and practical methods for data collection and analysis. Articulates a process for identifying lessons learned.
Best Practice
Describes any potential biases and/or confounding factors in the evaluation of the practice. Presents evaluation data that demonstrates positive outcomes. Describes how a continuous quality improvement process was implemented and any resulting changes to the practice that were made. Describes a process for identifying or assessing any unexpected or unintentional results.
Promising Practice
​Describes the need observed. Describes the intended benefit to the target population achieved through the practice. Describes who stakeholders are and how they are involved in decision-making throughout the following practice processes: development, implementation, quality improvement etc. Describes why the practice is worth sharing with others.
Emerging Practice
Rating Rubric
This rubric is intended to be a guide to scoring submission form for the OK Clearinghouse. Please read the entire submission before scoring the extent to which the applicant demonstrates the categories. Do not use decimals, use whole numbers.
Budget Template
This budget template is intended to be a guide for the budget proposal you should include with your project submission.
Submission window for round 6 is Aug. 21 to Sept. 8.
Focus area is child development.